36-1 Single-Slit Diffraction#

Prompts

  • What is a single-slit diffraction pattern? How does it differ from the pattern in Young’s double-slit experiment? What lies at the center?

  • Explain the zone method for finding the first minimum: why do we divide the slit into two zones? What path length difference gives destructive interference?

  • Write the condition for all minima in single-slit diffraction. How does the angle of the first minimum depend on slit width \(a\) and wavelength \(\lambda\)?

  • If we narrow the slit or increase the wavelength, does the diffraction pattern expand or contract? Why?

  • What is the Fresnel bright spot? Why did Poisson’s prediction (a bright spot in the shadow of a sphere) support the wave theory of light?

Lecture Notes#

Overview#

  • Single-slit diffraction: Light passing through a narrow slit produces a diffraction pattern—a broad central maximum, narrower secondary maxima, and minima in between. This is interference of Huygens wavelets from different points within the slit.

  • Minima occur when \(a\sin\theta = m\lambda\) (\(m = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\)). Maxima lie approximately halfway between adjacent minima.

  • Narrower slit \(\Rightarrow\) more diffraction (wider pattern). Diffraction limits geometrical optics when apertures are comparable to \(\lambda\).


Diffraction and the diffraction pattern#

When waves pass through an aperture or past an edge comparable in size to the wavelength, they spread (diffract) and interfere with themselves. The result is a diffraction pattern.

For a long narrow slit of width \(a\) illuminated by monochromatic light:

  • Central maximum: broad, intense. All Huygens wavelets from the slit travel nearly the same distance to the center \(\Rightarrow\) in phase.

  • Secondary maxima: narrower, less intense, on both sides.

  • Minima: dark fringes between the maxima.

Geometrical optics would predict a sharp slit image; the actual pattern shows that light is a wave.

Diffraction vs. double-slit interference

Double-slit (Ch. 35): two coherent sources; path length difference \(d\sin\theta\) determines bright/dark. Single-slit: many sources across the slit; we find minima by pairing zones that cancel.


Locating the minima: the zone method#

To find the first minimum, divide the slit into two zones of width \(a/2\) each. Consider rays from corresponding points in the two zones (e.g., top of each zone) reaching a point \(P_1\) at angle \(\theta\).

Path length difference between the two rays: \((a/2)\sin\theta\) (from the geometry when \(D \gg a\)).

For destructive interference, this difference must be \(\lambda/2\)—so the two rays cancel. Every such pair cancels; the whole slit contributes zero at \(P_1\):

(297)#\[ \frac{a}{2}\sin\theta = \frac{\lambda}{2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad a\sin\theta = \lambda \]

Second minimum: Divide the slit into four zones. Pairs from adjacent zones cancel when \((a/4)\sin\theta = \lambda/2\) \(\Rightarrow\) \(a\sin\theta = 2\lambda\).

All minima:

(298)#\[ a\sin\theta = m\lambda, \quad m = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \]

(\(m = 0\) gives \(\theta = 0\), the center—a maximum, not a minimum.)

Maxima: Approximately halfway between minima (e.g., first side maximum near \(a\sin\theta \approx 1.5\lambda\)). Exact positions require the intensity analysis of section 36-2.


Slit width and wavelength#

From \(a\sin\theta = m\lambda\):

Change

Effect on pattern

Narrower slit (\(a \downarrow\))

\(\theta\) increases \(\Rightarrow\) pattern expands

Longer wavelength (\(\lambda \uparrow\))

\(\theta\) increases \(\Rightarrow\) pattern expands

When \(a = \lambda\), the first minimum is at \(\theta = 90°\)—the central maximum fills the entire screen. Diffraction is strongest when the aperture is on the order of the wavelength.


Distance on the screen#

When \(\theta\) is small, \(\sin\theta \approx \theta\). The distance \(y\) from the center to the \(m\)th minimum is

(299)#\[ y \approx D\theta \approx D\,\frac{m\lambda}{a} \]

where \(D\) is the slit-to-screen distance. The width of the central maximum (distance between first minima) is \(\approx 2D\lambda/a\).


The Fresnel bright spot#

In 1819, Poisson (a Newtonian) argued that Fresnel’s wave theory predicted a bright spot at the center of the shadow of a sphere—seemingly absurd. The experiment showed the spot was there. This Fresnel bright spot supported the wave theory: light diffracts around the edge and interferes constructively at the center of the shadow.


Summary#

  • Single-slit diffraction: central maximum + secondary maxima separated by minima.

  • Minima: \(a\sin\theta = m\lambda\), \(m = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) (zone method: pair canceling waves).

  • Narrower slit or longer \(\lambda\) \(\Rightarrow\) pattern expands.

  • Fresnel bright spot: bright spot in shadow of disk/sphere; supports wave theory.