3.3 Stationary Phase#
Overview#
The path integral sums over all possible paths, each weighted by a phase \(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}S/\hbar}\). Yet macroscopic objects follow definite classical trajectories. The stationary phase approximation resolves this: when \(S \gg \hbar\), most paths cancel by destructive interference, and only the classical path (where \(\delta S = 0\)) survives. This section develops the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics, yielding the powerful WKB approximation and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule.
Topics#
Lesson |
Title |
Core Question |
|---|---|---|
3.3.1 |
How does classical mechanics emerge from the path integral as \(\hbar \to 0\)? |
|
3.3.2 |
How does separating phase from amplitude turn Schrödinger into Hamilton-Jacobi? |
|
3.3.3 |
Why does constructive interference of periodic orbits produce discrete energy levels? |
Key Concepts#
Stationary phase: oscillatory integrals dominated by \(\Phi'(x_0)=0\); in the path integral, this selects the classical path
WKB wavefunctions: \(\psi \sim (1/\sqrt{p})\,\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\int p\,\mathrm{d}x/\hbar}\) with phase from Hamilton-Jacobi, amplitude from probability conservation
Connection formulas: match oscillating and decaying solutions across turning points with \(\pi/4\) phase shifts
Bohr-Sommerfeld rule: \(\oint p\,\mathrm{d}x = 2\pi\hbar(n + \tfrac{1}{2})\) quantizes bound-state energies
Maslov index: the \(\tfrac{1}{2}\) from turning-point phases gives zero-point energy
Learning Objectives#
Apply stationary phase to evaluate oscillatory integrals and explain why the classical path dominates the path integral
Construct WKB wavefunctions in allowed and forbidden regions; use connection formulas at turning points
Derive energy levels from the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule and verify for the harmonic oscillator
Explain tunneling rates from WKB and the correspondence principle as \(S/\hbar \to \infty\)
Project#
Project: Semiclassical Theory of Quantum Chaos: Gutzwiller Trace Formula#
Objective: Implement the Gutzwiller trace formula, which connects quantum energy levels to classical periodic orbits, and test it on a simple chaotic billiard system to uncover the hidden classical structure in quantum chaos.
Background: One of the deepest insights of semiclassical physics is that quantum spectra encode information about classical dynamics. The Gutzwiller trace formula expresses the quantum density of states as a sum over all classical periodic orbits, weighted by the actions and stability properties (monodromy matrices) of those orbits. This formula is a frontier tool for understanding quantum chaos: systems whose classical counterparts are chaotic (exponential sensitivity to initial conditions) still possess a dense, deterministic quantum spectrum, yet that spectrum bears the mathematical fingerprint of the underlying chaotic dynamics. Applications range from quantum dots and microwave cavities to nuclear physics.
Suggested Approach:
Start with a simple integrable system (2D harmonic oscillator): find its classical periodic orbits analytically and compute the Gutzwiller formula. Verify that it reproduces the known quantum spectrum.
Study a 2D billiard system (e.g., square or circular billiard): compute its classical periodic orbits numerically by ray tracing (bounce maps).
For each periodic orbit, calculate the action \(S_p = \oint p \, \mathrm{d}q\) and the stability eigenvalues (Lyapunov exponents from the monodromy matrix).
Construct the Gutzwiller trace: \(\rho(E) = \rho_0(E) + \sum_p \rho_p(E)\), where \(\rho_0\) is the smooth part and \(\rho_p\) is the oscillating contribution from periodic orbit \(p\).
Compare to the quantum spectrum obtained by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian numerically in a finite domain. Do short periodic orbits dominate? Which orbits contribute most to oscillations?
Explore a chaotic billiard (e.g., stadium or Sinai billiard): show that the classical periodic orbits are now exponentially proliferating, yet the Gutzwiller formula still provides a quantitative account of spectral oscillations.
Expected Deliverable: A research report (5–10 pages) with code. Include: (i) classical billiard dynamics and periodic orbit enumeration, (ii) derivation and implementation of the Gutzwiller formula, (iii) quantum spectrum (from numerics) vs. semiclassical prediction (from Gutzwiller), (iv) quantitative comparison: residue analysis, quality of fit, (v) physical interpretation: why do classical periodic orbits predict quantum levels?, (vi) discussion of quantum chaos and the classical-quantum correspondence.
Key References: M. C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, 1990); D. Ullmo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 026001 (2008) [quantum chaos and periodic orbits]; E. B. Bogomolny et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2486 (2000).