3.3 Stationary Phase#

Overview#

The path integral sums over all possible paths, each weighted by a phase \(\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}S/\hbar}\). Yet macroscopic objects follow definite classical trajectories. The stationary phase approximation resolves this: when \(S \gg \hbar\), most paths cancel by destructive interference, and only the classical path (where \(\delta S = 0\)) survives. This section develops the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics, yielding the powerful WKB approximation and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule.

Topics#

Lesson

Title

Core Question

3.3.1

Stationary Phase Approximation

How does classical mechanics emerge from the path integral as \(\hbar \to 0\)?

3.3.2

WKB Approximation

How does separating phase from amplitude turn Schrödinger into Hamilton-Jacobi?

3.3.3

Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization

Why does constructive interference of periodic orbits produce discrete energy levels?

Key Concepts#

  • Stationary phase: oscillatory integrals dominated by \(\Phi'(x_0)=0\); in the path integral, this selects the classical path

  • WKB wavefunctions: \(\psi \sim (1/\sqrt{p})\,\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\int p\,\mathrm{d}x/\hbar}\) with phase from Hamilton-Jacobi, amplitude from probability conservation

  • Connection formulas: match oscillating and decaying solutions across turning points with \(\pi/4\) phase shifts

  • Bohr-Sommerfeld rule: \(\oint p\,\mathrm{d}x = 2\pi\hbar(n + \tfrac{1}{2})\) quantizes bound-state energies

  • Maslov index: the \(\tfrac{1}{2}\) from turning-point phases gives zero-point energy

Learning Objectives#

  • Apply stationary phase to evaluate oscillatory integrals and explain why the classical path dominates the path integral

  • Construct WKB wavefunctions in allowed and forbidden regions; use connection formulas at turning points

  • Derive energy levels from the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule and verify for the harmonic oscillator

  • Explain tunneling rates from WKB and the correspondence principle as \(S/\hbar \to \infty\)

Project#

Project: Semiclassical Theory of Quantum Chaos: Gutzwiller Trace Formula#

Objective: Implement the Gutzwiller trace formula, which connects quantum energy levels to classical periodic orbits, and test it on a simple chaotic billiard system to uncover the hidden classical structure in quantum chaos.

Background: One of the deepest insights of semiclassical physics is that quantum spectra encode information about classical dynamics. The Gutzwiller trace formula expresses the quantum density of states as a sum over all classical periodic orbits, weighted by the actions and stability properties (monodromy matrices) of those orbits. This formula is a frontier tool for understanding quantum chaos: systems whose classical counterparts are chaotic (exponential sensitivity to initial conditions) still possess a dense, deterministic quantum spectrum, yet that spectrum bears the mathematical fingerprint of the underlying chaotic dynamics. Applications range from quantum dots and microwave cavities to nuclear physics.

Suggested Approach:

  • Start with a simple integrable system (2D harmonic oscillator): find its classical periodic orbits analytically and compute the Gutzwiller formula. Verify that it reproduces the known quantum spectrum.

  • Study a 2D billiard system (e.g., square or circular billiard): compute its classical periodic orbits numerically by ray tracing (bounce maps).

  • For each periodic orbit, calculate the action \(S_p = \oint p \, \mathrm{d}q\) and the stability eigenvalues (Lyapunov exponents from the monodromy matrix).

  • Construct the Gutzwiller trace: \(\rho(E) = \rho_0(E) + \sum_p \rho_p(E)\), where \(\rho_0\) is the smooth part and \(\rho_p\) is the oscillating contribution from periodic orbit \(p\).

  • Compare to the quantum spectrum obtained by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian numerically in a finite domain. Do short periodic orbits dominate? Which orbits contribute most to oscillations?

  • Explore a chaotic billiard (e.g., stadium or Sinai billiard): show that the classical periodic orbits are now exponentially proliferating, yet the Gutzwiller formula still provides a quantitative account of spectral oscillations.

Expected Deliverable: A research report (5–10 pages) with code. Include: (i) classical billiard dynamics and periodic orbit enumeration, (ii) derivation and implementation of the Gutzwiller formula, (iii) quantum spectrum (from numerics) vs. semiclassical prediction (from Gutzwiller), (iv) quantitative comparison: residue analysis, quality of fit, (v) physical interpretation: why do classical periodic orbits predict quantum levels?, (vi) discussion of quantum chaos and the classical-quantum correspondence.

Key References: M. C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, 1990); D. Ullmo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 026001 (2008) [quantum chaos and periodic orbits]; E. B. Bogomolny et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2486 (2000).